Can a Virtual Artist Still Have a Human Point of View?

Vicenia looks and sounds like an artist. She has her own voice, visual identity, music videos, and an evolving story. But behind the project is Jorge, who creates under the name Creaydestruye and directs the creative decisions that shape her.

In the latest RealMusic.ai podcast, Jorge explains how Vicenia was built and why the project raises a bigger question than whether AI can make music. When a human develops the concept, establishes the taste, guides the process, and remains transparent about the technology, where does the creative authorship really sit?

Jorge does not describe himself as a musician in the traditional sense. His background is in photography, communication, and audiovisual work. He plays keyboard, develops musical ideas, directs Vicenia’s visual world, and decides which sounds, images, and concepts belong in the project. AI is part of that process, but it is not the whole process.

That distinction matters. Creative work has always involved people directing tools and collaborators toward a particular vision. AI adds another layer, but the intention still has to come from somewhere. In Vicenia’s case, that intention comes from Jorge.

One of the more revealing parts of the conversation is how listeners react once they learn that Vicenia is virtual. Someone may enjoy a song and then feel differently after discovering that AI was involved. The music has not changed. The context has.

That is why transparency is so important. Jorge is open about Vicenia being an AI artist and about his role in creating her. The project is not trying to pass a fictional performer off as a real person. The artificial identity is part of the concept.

AI also gave Jorge more creative independence. In previous collaborations with producers, he sometimes struggled to translate an idea exactly as he imagined it. AI allowed him to test concepts, build musical sketches, and explore directions without depending on someone else to execute every early-stage decision.

But the story does not end with automation. Jorge later brought human singers, musicians, and producers back into the process. That makes Vicenia less of an argument for replacing musicians and more of an example of a hybrid creative workflow. AI helped establish the world, and human collaborators helped expand it.

That combination complicates what we mean when we call something an “AI artist.” Vicenia may be virtual, but the project contains human decisions at nearly every level, from concept and visual direction to musical references, editing, and collaboration.

The identity is fictional. The creative intention is not.

As virtual artists become more common, that may become the more useful question. Not simply whether the performer physically exists, but whether there is a recognizable human perspective behind the work and whether the process is presented honestly.

What you’ll learn in this episode:

• How Jorge created the virtual artist Vicenia

• Why transparency matters with AI-created identities

• How AI gave Jorge more creative independence

• Why human musicians and producers became part of the project

• How virtual artists complicate traditional ideas about authorship

• Why creative direction may matter more in AI-assisted music

Watch the full episode on YouTube or listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Watch the podcast clip.

Video Episode: YouTube